unless the times of india is suggesting that, the every american president needs to have an active service record, the picture is nothing but a low blow.
by the by - post 1947, as far as I can recall, none of the indian prime ministers had served in the armed services, and yet, they ordered the indian army into war several times.
When you run as a militaristic candidate despite being a draft dodger, Swift Boat your actual military vet opposition and lie to get the country into an optional war, you have a far higher burden than just being a civvie.
by the by - post 1947, as far as I can recall, none of the Indian prime ministers had served in the armed services, and yet, they ordered the Indian army into war several times.
None did have a military record. But they did not involve themselves in wars of invasion. All wars were in face of aggression.
Guess Which Country’s Papers Didn’t Have the Balls to Print That Headline.
Lakdawala was this close to becoming my new hero. Sigh.
And wow, just for that photograph of Bush, the ToI might have redeemed itself for the next decade.
unless the times of india is suggesting that, the every american president needs to have an active service record, the picture is nothing but a low blow.
by the by - post 1947, as far as I can recall, none of the indian prime ministers had served in the armed services, and yet, they ordered the indian army into war several times.
When you run as a militaristic candidate despite being a draft dodger, Swift Boat your actual military vet opposition and lie to get the country into an optional war, you have a far higher burden than just being a civvie.
by the by - post 1947, as far as I can recall, none of the Indian prime ministers had served in the armed services, and yet, they ordered the Indian army into war several times.
None did have a military record. But they did not involve themselves in wars of invasion. All wars were in face of aggression.